Courts have struggled to uniformly decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate because of a person’s “sex,” protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or transgender status. Specifically, courts have not consistently interpreted Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex.” Originally, courts considering the question held that Title VII’s ban did not cover employees who were gay, and most said it did not protect employees based on transgender status. Within the last decade, however, many courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission began to interpret “sex” to include LGBTQ employees.Not all courts, nor the Department of Justice, agreed with this interpretation. This issue was presented to the Supreme Court of the United States through three cases. Click here to continue reading.
Search Blog
Subscribe to Blog
Enter your email address to
receive notifications of new
posts by email.About this Blog
Snell & Wilmer’s Labor and Employment Law Blog provides breaking news and updates on legal issues facing employers.Topics
- ADA
- ADEA
- Arbitration
- Arizona
- California
- Class Action
- Colorado
- Confidentiality
- Discrimination
- DOL
- EEOC
- FCRA
- Federal Contractor
- FLSA
- FMLA
- Handbook
- Hiring
- Idaho
- Immigration
- Independent Contractor
- Labor
- Minimum Wage
- Nevada
- New Mexico
- NLRA
- NLRB
- OSHA
- Pay
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Restrictive Covenant
- Sick Leave
- Snell & Wilmer
- Social Media
- Texas
- Title VII
- Trade Secrets
- Transgender
- Uncategorized
- Unions
- Utah
- Whistleblower
- Work Authorization