On April 20, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, in the case Nguyen v. Inter-Coast International Training, Inc., held that an arbitration agreement contained in an employee handbook was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. In that case, after a wage and hour class action was filed and certified against the employer, the employer modified its employee handbook which included the arbitration agreement. The employer then sought to move to compel arbitration of all class members who signed the updated handbook. The trial court denied the employer’s motion and the Court of Appeal affirmed, finding: (1) the arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable based on the fact that the agreement was part of an 11 page employee handbook, with no style elements differentiating the arbitration provision from the other unrelated provisions in the handbook; and (2) the arbitration agreement was substantively unconscionable because nothing in the agreement or the manner in which it was provided to employees informed them that by signing the agreement they were giving up their right to participate in the pending class action.
Search Blog
Subscribe to Blog
Enter your email address to
receive notifications of new
posts by email.About this Blog
Snell & Wilmer’s Labor and Employment Law Blog provides breaking news and updates on legal issues facing employers.Topics
- ADA
- ADEA
- Arbitration
- Arizona
- California
- Class Action
- Colorado
- Confidentiality
- Discrimination
- DOL
- EEOC
- FCRA
- Federal Contractor
- FLSA
- FMLA
- Handbook
- Hiring
- Idaho
- Immigration
- Independent Contractor
- Labor
- Minimum Wage
- Nevada
- New Mexico
- NLRA
- NLRB
- OSHA
- Pay
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Restrictive Covenant
- Sick Leave
- Snell & Wilmer
- Social Media
- Texas
- Title VII
- Trade Secrets
- Transgender
- Uncategorized
- Unions
- Utah
- Whistleblower
- Work Authorization