Publication
Health Law Checkup – November 2011
What’s Up With the Individual Mandate in the Health Care Reform Act?
The legal battle over the constitutionality of the Health Care Reform Act (Act) is on its way to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final decision. To date, multiple federal trial courts have been sharply divided on the constitutionality of the “individual mandate” requirement. The individual mandate is but one provision in a massive piece of legislation—but most consider it to be the linchpin to provide affordable health insurance coverage for all. This is because the Act requires all individuals to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty. The Act presumes that the vast majority of people will elect to purchase insurance rather than to pay a penalty. In exchange for providing a broad pool of insureds paying premiums to insurers, the Act prohibits insurers from denying coverage to applicants with pre-existing conditions, setting lifetime limits on coverage and setting annual benefit limits. If the individual mandate is invalidated, this balance collapses.
About Snell & Wilmer
Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm with more than 500 attorneys practicing in 16 locations throughout the United States and in Mexico, including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego, California; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Denver, Colorado; Washington, D.C.; Boise, Idaho; Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Portland, Oregon; Dallas, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; and Los Cabos, Mexico. The firm represents clients ranging from large, publicly traded corporations to small businesses, individuals and entrepreneurs. For more information, visit swlaw.com.