SWIPLit
Octane Fitness and Highmark Apply to Ninth Circuit Attorney Fee Awards under the Lanham Act
The Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision came in SunEarth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co. In that case, the district court denied attorney fees under the Lanham Act after enjoining infringement of SunEarth’s trademarks. SunEarth appealed the denial of fees to the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit relied on the Ninth Circuit’s previous test for determining attorney fee liability under the Lanham Act: “malicious, fraudulent, deliberate or willful” infringement. Under the previous standard, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of attorney fees. The “malicious, fraudulent, deliberate or willful” infringement standard was overruled on October 24, 2016 by the en banc court, and the matter has been remanded.
The Ninth Circuit’s decision to apply the Octane Fitness test to the Lanham Act’s attorney fee provision is in line with the majority of other circuits, including the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits, which have recognized that Octane Fitness changed the standard for determining fee awards under the Lanham Act.