Employee Benefits

Non-integrated health reimbursement arrangements (whatever they are called) are subject to $36,500 per-participant per-year penalty

Mar 19, 2014
Nancy K. Campbell, Of Counsel in our Phoenix location.
Nancy K. Campbell,
Of Counsel
Last fall the IRS and DOL issued nearly identical guidance, IRS Notice 2013-54 and DOL Technical Release 2013-03, explaining how certain Health Care Reform Act rules apply to health reimbursement arrangements (“HRAs”).  Notice 2013-54 is not good news for most HRAs, also called medical expense reimbursement plans (“MERPs”).  Executive physical plans are often structured as HRAs, so they too may be in trouble.  Notice 2013-54 is generally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

Under Notice 2013-54, most HRAs must be integrated with other group health coverage in order to avoid a $100 per-participant per-day penalty.  This equates to a $36,500 per-participant per-year penalty.

Employers may still offer retiree-only HRAs and “excepted benefit” HRAs without integrating such HRAs with other coverage because those two types of HRAs are exempt from the Health Care Reform Act. IRS Notice 2013-54 indicates that all other HRAs must use one of two methods to integrate with other group health plan coverage in order to satisfy the annual dollar-limit prohibition and requirement to provide first dollar preventive care.  Both of these methods require that the HRA be limited only to employees who are enrolled in the integrated non-HRA group health coverage.

  • The first method, called the “minimum value not required method,” requires that the HRA reimburse only co-payments, co-insurance, deductibles and premiums under the non-HRA group coverage, or reimburse medical care other than essential health benefits.
  • The second method, called the “minimum value required method,” does not have any use restrictions, as does the first method, but requires that the non-HRA coverage be “minimum value.”

The surprising news is that neither method requires that the HRA and non-HRA coverage have the same sponsor. This means an employer may “integrate” its HRA with another employer’s non-HRA coverage. Both methods also require that employees be allowed to permanently opt-out of HRA coverage and, upon termination of employment either forfeit their HRA balance or permanently opt-out of coverage.

Ideally, HRAs should have been amended before the 2014 plan year to comply with one of these integration methods, both of which have very detailed requirements.  The $100 per-participant per-day penalty started accruing on January 1, 2014 for non-integrated HRAs.  Employers who have not yet integrated their HRAs may wish to amend their plans as soon as possible to integrate and may wish to consider self-reporting any applicable penalties.

For more information on how the Health Care Reform Act impacts account based health plans such as HRAs and cafeteria plans, see IRS Notice 2013-54 and the Snell & Wilmer 2013 End of Year Plan Sponsor “To Do” List  Part 2 – Health and Welfare.

Media Contact

Olivia Nguyen-Quang

Associate Director of Communications
media@swlaw.com 714.427.7490