NLRB Awards Bargaining Expenses to Union
August 15, 2022
By Gerard Morales
In a recent case, the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Court) enforced an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) requiring an employer to reimburse the union for the expenses that the union incurred during collective bargaining negotiations. NLRB v. Ampersand Publishing, 9th Cir., No. 21-71060, 8/11/22. The bargaining negotiations expenses included the legal fees the union had paid to outside counsel for consultation during the negotiations.
The NLRB had found that the employer had engaged in bad faith bargaining during the negotiations by, inter alia, making unilateral changes in the terms and conditions of employment of the employees subject of the negotiations and by transferring bargaining unit work out of the unit without notice to the union. The Board found that such conduct constituted aggravated misconduct that justified more than the traditional cease and desist remedy. Accordingly, the Board ordered the employer to reimburse the union for the bargaining expenses it had incurred.
Recognizing that under the Act (Labor Management Relations Act, see 29 U.S.C. Sec. 160 et seq.) the NLRB has “exceedingly broad” discretion in selecting remedies for unfair labor practices, the Court rejected the employer’s defense that the NLRB lacked authority to award the union reimbursement for its bargaining expenses. The Court noted that while the NLRB does not have the authority to require reimbursement of litigation costs, as such remedy would be punitive in nature and “thus beyond the Board’s remedial power,” the reimbursement award here was not for litigation expenses. Rather, the reimbursement ordered by the Board was for expenses, including legal fees, incurred during the bargaining process. Therefore, such expenses incurred by the union were primarily compensatory.
In a prior Alert, we discussed the NLRB General Counsel’s (GC) announcement that she would seek to expand remedies beyond those that have been traditionally imposed in unfair labor practice cases. In furtherance of that objective, the GC has instructed the Regional Directors to seek “consequential damages” in unfair labor practice cases. Such damages would include items, such as reimbursement for late car, mortgage and rent fees, reimbursement for interest payments on loans taken by unlawfully terminated workers to cover living expenses, etc.
©2023 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. All rights reserved. The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with information on current topics of general interest and nothing herein shall be construed to create, offer, or memorialize the existence of an attorney-client relationship. The content should not be considered legal advice or opinion, because it may not apply to the specific facts of a particular matter. As guidance in areas is constantly changing and evolving, you should consider checking for updated guidance, or consult with legal counsel, before making any decisions.
The material in this newsletter may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the written permission of Snell & Wilmer.