Legal Alert: Oracle Busts Google's Work-Product Protection Claim
September 12, 2011
Oracle Busts the Attorney-Client Privilege on an Internal Google Email to Its In-House Counsel
by Dan W. Goldfine
Suppose a competitor with a reputation for suing or a government agent drops by, accusing a company of wrongdoing. In response, in-house counsel concludes that it is prudent to determine whether there is merit to the accusation of wrongdoing. In-house counsel then instructs a senior employee to gather information about the accusation of wrongdoing and report back via email. Senior employee collects information and prepares an email summarizing his/her conclusion, including some less-than-flattering information. Senior employee addresses the email to management and in-house counsel, marking the email "attorney-client privilege" and/or "attorney work product." During the subsequent litigation with respect to the previous accusation of wrongdoing, the company asserts attorney-client privilege and attorney work product with respect to the email and all drafts thereof. The other side moves to compel the production of the email and all drafts thereof.
Google, in a dispute with Oracle, was faced with these facts, and the court ruled that the email and drafts of the email were neither attorney-client privilege nor work product and ordered their production....
©2022 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. All rights reserved. The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with information on current topics of general interest and nothing herein shall be construed to create, offer, or memorialize the existence of an attorney-client relationship. The content should not be considered legal advice or opinion, because it may not apply to the specific facts of a particular matter. As guidance in areas is constantly changing and evolving, you should consider checking for updated guidance, or consult with legal counsel, before making any decisions.