Corporate Communicator - Summer 2017
June 01, 2017
by Cheryl A. Ikegami
In the Spring 2017 issue of our Corporate Communicator, we included a brief discussion of the status of the conflict minerals rules contained in Rule 13p-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the related Form SD (the “Rules”). The Rules implement Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). We noted that in litigation challenging the Rules brought by the National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable (the “Litigation”), the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Rules violated the First Amendment to the extent that they require companies to state in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and on their websites that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free.’” We noted that the SEC had declined to appeal that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court and the case had been remanded to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for further proceedings.
©2022 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. All rights reserved. The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with information on current topics of general interest and nothing herein shall be construed to create, offer, or memorialize the existence of an attorney-client relationship. The content should not be considered legal advice or opinion, because it may not apply to the specific facts of a particular matter. As guidance in areas is constantly changing and evolving, you should consider checking for updated guidance, or consult with legal counsel, before making any decisions.
The material in this newsletter may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the written permission of Snell & Wilmer.