Publication

Title V Emergency Affirmative Defense Provision Reinstated by DC Circuit Court

Sep 09, 2025

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals decided on September 5, 2025, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) erred in implementing its 2023 Final Rule on “Removal of Title V Emergency Affirmative Defense Provisions From State Operating Permit Programs and Federal Operating Permit Program” (2023 Final Rule).1

For over 30 years, 40 C.F.R §70.6(g) provided regulated entities the ability to demonstrate that an occurrence of an emission standard violation was due to “sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of the source, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed a technology-based emission limitation under the permit, due to unavoidable increases in emissions attributable to the emergency.” However, the 2023 Final Rule completely removed this provision.

EPA reasoned that the emergency affirmative defense was “inconsistent with the EPA’s interpretation of the enforcement structure of the Clean Air Act…in light of prior court decisions …”2 Specifically, the EPA “maintained the affirmative defense encroached on the judiciary’s statutory authority to assess civil penalties,” and that “defense functioned as an exemption that rendered emission limitations non-continuous in violation of the Clean Air Act.”3 However, the Petitioners argued that the Final Rule “rests entirely on erroneous legal justifications.” The DC Circuit agreed.4

The Court stated that “a complete affirmative defense, like the one at issue here, is permissible because it relates to the antecedent question of liability and therefore does not impinge on the judiciary’s authority to award ‘appropriate civil penalties.’ 42 U.S.C. §7604(a).”5 The Court further stated that while an “affirmative defense allows a defendant to avoid liability…it does not alter the underlying legal requirements …. [that] the Title V affirmative defense for emergencies does not lift applicable standards … [and since] the emission standards are never lifted, they apply ‘on a continuous basis’ as required by the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. §760d(k).”6

The Court agreed with the Petitioners that the EPA’s reasoning for implementing its 2023 Final Rule “cannot be squared with the text of the Clean Air Act or [the Court’s] precedents …” and that the 2023 Final Rule is “unreasonable and not in accordance with the law.”7 The Court’s Opinion reversing the 2023 Final Rule so that the emergency affirmative defense is reinstated is a significant victory for regulated entities.

Footnotes

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Removal of Title V Emergency Affirmative Defense Provisions From State Operating Permit Programs and Federal Operating Permit Programs Final Rule. (2023 Final Rule). 88 Fed. Reg. 47029-47054 (July 21, 2023).

  2. Id. at p.47029

  3. Opinion at p.9.

  4. Id. at p.2.

  5. Id. at p.10.

  6. Id. at pp.11-12.

  7. Id. p.13.

Back to top

About Snell & Wilmer

Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm with more than 500 attorneys practicing in 17 locations throughout the United States and in Mexico, including Los Angeles, Orange County, Palo Alto and San Diego, California; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Denver, Colorado; Washington, D.C.; Boise, Idaho; Las Vegas and Reno-Tahoe, Nevada; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Portland, Oregon; Dallas, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; and Los Cabos, Mexico. The firm represents clients ranging from large, publicly traded corporations to small businesses, individuals and entrepreneurs. For more information, visit swlaw.com.

©2025 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. All rights reserved. The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with information on current topics of general interest and nothing herein shall be construed to create, offer, or memorialize the existence of an attorney-client relationship. The content should not be considered legal advice or opinion, because it may not apply to the specific facts of a particular matter. As guidance in areas is constantly changing and evolving, you should consider checking for updated guidance, or consult with legal counsel, before making any decisions.
Media Contact

Olivia Nguyen-Quang

Associate Director of Communications
media@swlaw.com 714.427.7490