Publication
Financial Services Litigation Bulletin-September 2010
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) contains two separate provisions addressing the extent to which state law claims are preempted by the FCRA. Courts have had some difficulty in reconciling the application of these competing preemption provisions as applied to state law causes of action alleged against furnishers of information, as defined by the FCRA, who report information regarding consumers to the various credit reporting agencies. As discussed more fully below, a split may be developing in the Ninth Circuit with respect to whether, and under what circumstances, the FCRA completely preempts all state law claims alleged as against furnishers of information. Nevertheless, the prevailing view of a majority of district courts within the Ninth Circuit is that the FCRA completely preempts all such state law statutory and common law claims. This view is also advanced in an unpublished Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. As such, a practitioner defending a complaint arising out of the conduct of a furnisher in the context of reporting information to consumer reporting agencies that alleges common law causes of action should give strong consideration to asserting that any such state law claims are completely preempted by the FCRA.
About Snell & Wilmer
Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm with more than 500 attorneys practicing in 16 locations throughout the United States and in Mexico, including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego, California; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Denver, Colorado; Washington, D.C.; Boise, Idaho; Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Portland, Oregon; Dallas, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; and Los Cabos, Mexico. The firm represents clients ranging from large, publicly traded corporations to small businesses, individuals and entrepreneurs. For more information, visit swlaw.com.