The Colorado Supreme Court affirms Woodbridge II’s “Adverse Use” Distinction

By: Luke Mecklenburg Last year, I posted regarding the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Woodbridge II, which concluded that the “adverse use” element for prescriptive easement claims only requires the claimant to “show a nonpermissive or otherwise unauthorized use … Continue reading

Author: Luke Mecklenburg | Leave a comment Tagged , ,

Share this Article:

Woodbridge II and the Nuanced Meaning of “Adverse Use” in Hostile Property Rights Cases in Colorado

Earlier this year, the Colorado Court of Appeals issued an opinion addressing at length “whether the requirement that the use be ‘adverse’ in the adverse possession context is coextensive with adverse use in the prescriptive easement context.”  See Woodbridge Condo. … Continue reading

Author: Luke Mecklenburg | Leave a comment Tagged , , ,

Share this Article: