Deferral By The NLRB To Grievance/Arbitration Procedures

Overruling 2014 precedent, see Babcock & Wilcox Construction, 361 NLRB 1127 (2014), the National Labor Relations Board (Board), last week in UPS, Inc. 369 NLRB No. 1 (Dec. 23, 2019), returned to the standard that applied from 1984 to 2014 for deferral of alleged unlawful discharges and/or disciplinary action against employees to contractual grievance/arbitration procedures. See Spielberg Mfg.Co., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955); Olin Corp., 268 NLRB 573 (1984)

Going forward, the Board will defer cases alleging unlawful discharge or discipline to arbitration decisions when:

  1. The arbitration proceedings were fair and regular;
  2. The parties agreed to be bound by the arbitration;
  3. The contractual issue was factually parallel to the unfair labor practice issue;
  4. The arbitrator was presented generally with the facts relevant to resolving the unfair labor practice; and
  5. The arbitral award was not clearly repugnant to the purposes and policies of the National Labor Relations Act
This entry was posted in Arbitration, NLRA, NLRB and tagged , , , , , , .

Share this Article:

Leave a Reply

View Reply Form

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>